2026年4月28日，汇仲“再审改判胜诉经验”系列交流会第四场收官活动回归系列起点北京，汇仲律师与到场三十余位法律同仁及相关领域从业者，深入交流了办理再审案件的心得与经验。

本场交流会由汇仲陈樱娥律师担任主持人，王真律师作为开场嘉宾，石睿律师、孟也甜律师、苏志甫律师作为主讲嘉宾先后进行了分享。嘉宾们结合实务数据与亲办典型案例，从趋势理念到实操细节，系统拆解了办理再审案件的方法论。

On April 28, 2026, the fourth and closing event of Hui Zhong’s seminar series on successful retrial reversal cases returned to Beijing, where the series originally launched. Hui’s attorneys exchanged in-depth insights on retrial practice with over thirty legal practitioners and industry professionals in attendance.

The seminar was hosted by Ying’e Chen. Zhen Wang delivered the opening remarks, while Rui Shi, Yetian Meng and Zhifu Su presented featured speeches in sequence. Drawing on practical data and landmark cases they personally handled, the speakers systematically laid out full-fledged methodologies for retrial litigation, covering strategic frameworks down to granular operational techniques.

【主题分享环节】

分享环节，开场嘉宾王真律师结合其参与全国人大法工委民诉法修订研讨会的经历，回顾了“四级法院审级职能定位改革”试点时期前后再审制度运行的总体情况；介绍了汇仲团队长期深耕再审案件的实务积累；阐明了本次系列交流会秉持开放、共进的理念，将团队在再审实务中的心得与行业同仁充分分享的初衷，为本次活动定下基调。

【Featured Presentations】

Zhen Wang recounted his participation in the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People’s Congress’s seminar on revisions to the Civil Procedure Law, reviewing the operation of the retrial system before and after the pilot reform of the four-tier court functional positioning. He also shared Hui Zhong’s long-standing track record handling retrial matters, and outlined the open, collaborative ethos behind this seminar series: to openly share the firm’s hands-on retrial experience with industry peers, setting the tone for the session.

石睿律师丨从审查到审理：走进再审之门

石睿律师以“从审查到审理——走进再审之门”为主题，从近十年再审申请数量翻倍、再审改判数量却近乎保持不变的数据情况出发，通过对比“存在瑕疵但被驳回”与“存在瑕疵且成功改判”的六组亲办案例，透视出13个法定再审事由背后，决定案件能否进入再审的因素：原审判决是否会引发显失公平社会后果、案件是否具备典型行业示范意义或是否拥有足以颠覆原审事实认定的新证据等等。由此提出律师在再审案件中扮演的角色不同于一审、二审的“叙事者”，而是应当作为“挑战者”，打破法官对生效判决的先入为主。具体而言，首先需要与法官“同频共振”：找到法官的利益平衡点，而非一味强调自身冤屈；其次“打破支点”：用证据摧毁原审的核心逻辑，而非空谈不公；最后“步步为营”：不断积累再审可能性，而非一次性谋求确定性。

Rui Shi: From Case Review to Formal Hearing – Opening the Door to Retrials

Rui Shi started with industry data showing retrial applications have doubled over the past decade, yet the total number of reversed judgments has remained nearly flat. By comparing six paired sets of his own cases — ones with procedural defects that were rejected, versus those with defects that secured reversals — he unpacks the key factors that determine whether a case proceeds to retrial under the 13 statutory grounds for retrial. Critical considerations include whether the original ruling would lead manifestly unfair social outcomes, whether the dispute carries industry-wide precedent value, or whether new evidence exists capable of completely overturning the original factual findings.

He argued that retrial lawyers play a distinct role from advocates at first and second instance: rather than merely narrating a client’s story, they must act as challengers to dismantle the court’s preconceived acceptance of a binding judgment. His three core actionable strategies:

1.Align with adjudicators’ logic: Identify the judge’s balancing of interests instead of only emphasizing the client’s grievances;

2.Strike at core fulcrums: Use evidence to dismantle the original judgment’s foundational reasoning, rather than making generic complaints of unfairness;

3.Advance incrementally: Build cumulative grounds for retrial rather than demanding a guaranteed reversal in one go.

孟也甜律师丨再审阶段法律文书的攻防与逆转

孟也甜律师以“再审阶段法律文书的攻防与逆转”为题，详细拆解了两则由其代理的再审改判案例，生动演绎了如何寻找并撬动再审的“支点”。对于抽象法律适用错误的案件，孟律师详细复盘了一则“法人人格否认”案例的代理策略与再审申请书，总结了再审律师工作的方法论：回归条文基本原理，拆解规则构成要件，拔高案件裁判价值，让法官有明确的改判依据。对于事实认定错误的案件，孟律师通过复盘一则“逾期付款违约案”，详细介绍了代理团队通过证据挖掘与组织补强我方证据的证明力的过程，总结纠正原审错误认定的支点在于：挖掘细节证据、构建完整证据链，用客观常识与商业逻辑还原事实。

Yetian Meng: Offensive & Defensive Strategies for Persuasive Retrial Submissions That Secure Reversals

Yetian Meng conducted a detailed breakdown of two successful retrial reversal cases she litigated, illustrating how to identify and leverage pivotal legal fulcrums to overturn original rulings.

1.Cases involving erroneous application of law (piercing the corporate veil dispute): She reviewed her drafting strategy for the retrial petition, outlining a methodology: return to the fundamental rationale of statutory provisions, dissect constituent elements of legal rules, elevate the precedential value of the dispute, and supply judges with clear, solid grounds to reverse the original decision.

2.Cases involving misdetermined facts (late payment liquidated damages dispute): She demonstrated how to excavate and supplement corroborating evidence to strengthen the client’s evidentiary weight, establishing that the key to correcting flawed factual findings lies in uncovering granular supporting proof, forming complete evidentiary chains, and reconstructing objective facts through common sense and commercial logic.

苏志甫律师丨在稳定与纠错之间——二审、再审裁判形成逻辑的双重观察

拥有前法官与现律师双重视角的苏志甫律师压轴分享，开篇即点明改判之难的本质：申请人认为的“有理”与法官判决的依据常存在认知鸿沟。提出了触动法官改判的三大价值支点：规则价值（明晰裁判规则）、先例价值（填补裁判空白）、产业价值（产生正面社会引导）。他以亲身办理并入选典型案例的多起案件为例，说明只有让法官看到改判的超越个案的意义，才能真正打动他们。基于此，苏律师总结了在二审、再审阶段实现改判的方法论：首先要“吃透原判逻辑，摒弃盲目挑错”；其次需“精准识别1-2个核心突破点，拒绝面面俱到”；进而要结合改判支点“重构叙事”；最终要立足裁判视角，“做裁判的推进者”，为法官提供合法、合理且有价值的改判选项，实现与法官的“同频共振”。

Drawing on dual perspectives as a former judge and practicing lawyer, Zhifu Su delivered the closing presentation. He began by pinpointing the fundamental difficulty of securing judgment reversals: there is often a cognitive gap between what applicants view as meritorious arguments and the legal bases relied upon by judges when rendering rulings. He put forward three core value pillars that can persuade judges to reverse decisions, namely normative value to clarify adjudication rules, precedent value to fill gaps in judicial practice, and industrial value to generate positive social guidance. Citing multiple landmark cases he handled that were designated as model precedents, he explained that judges can only be genuinely persuaded when they recognize that a reversal carries significance extending beyond the individual dispute. On this basis, Attorney Su outlined a methodology for securing reversed rulings at the second-instance and retrial stages. Practitioners must first fully comprehend the reasoning of the original judgment and refrain from superficial, unfocused criticism. Second, they need to accurately identify one or two core breakthrough points instead of attempting to address every potential issue. Practitioners should then restructure their case narrative around the aforementioned value pillars. Ultimately, they should adopt a judicial mindset, act as facilitators for adjudication, and present judges with legitimate, reasonable and valuable grounds for reversal to achieve aligned thinking with the tribunal.

【圆桌交流环节】

在随后的圆桌交流环节，与会者围绕再审实务中的核心困惑踊跃提问，三位嘉宾结合自身经验给予了坦诚而具象的解答。交流涵盖了新证据的认定尺度、再审文书的撰写技巧以及再审辅助材料的准备方法等多元议题，以及与会者提出的部分具体案件涉及的法律及实操问题。

【Panel Discussion】

During the subsequent roundtable discussion, attendees raised active questions concerning core challenges in retrial practice. The three speakers offered candid, concrete answers drawing on their professional experience. The discussion covered a wide range of topics, including the admissibility standards for new evidence, drafting techniques for retrial submissions, protocols for preparing supporting retrial materials, as well as legal and practical issues related to specific ongoing cases brought forward by attendees.

本次北京收官场活动，三位嘉宾通过多维度、全流程的干货分享，为与会者绘制了一幅详尽的“再审攻略图”，也为本次再审系列交流会画上了一个阶段性句号。本次系列交流会在两个月内，跨越京、沪、深三座城市，通过四场活动，吸引了超过200人报名参与。汇仲十三位合伙人、顾问及律师，与参会各界同仁毫无保留地分享了汇仲长期深耕再审案件积累的经验与方法，在专业度、内容充实度等多方面获得了广泛好评。后续，汇仲将继续秉持开放、分享、共进的理念，围绕不同主题持续推出交流会等活动，诚邀各界同仁继续关注，共探实务，携手前行。

This closing session in Beijing featured multi-faceted, end-to-end practical insights shared by the three speakers, offering attendees a comprehensive roadmap for retrial practice and marking a phased conclusion to this series of exchange seminars. Over the course of two months, the series spanned Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen across four events, attracting more than 200 registrants. Thirteen partners, counsel and attorneys from Hui Zhong openly shared the experience and methodologies the firm has accumulated through long-standing work on retrial matters, earning widespread acclaim for professionalism and substantive content. Moving forward, Hui Zhong will continue to uphold the philosophy of openness, knowledge-sharing and mutual progress, and host ongoing seminars covering diverse themes. We sincerely invite peers from all sectors to stay engaged as we jointly explore practical legal issues and forge ahead together.

声明：本文观点仅供参考，不可视为汇仲律师事务所及其律师对有关问题出具的正式法律意见。如您有任何法律问题或需要法律意见，请与本所联系。