Tang Youjun graduated from China University of Political Science and Law with both a bachelor's and a master's degree, specializing in the resolution of civil and commercial disputes and research on corporate financing and investment disputes. He has achieved victorious outcomes for his clients in major and critical cases in the Supreme People's Court, some High People's courts, and the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court. He is particularly adept at handling various investment and financing disputes and their derivative corporate control disputes, corporate governance disputes, etc.

• In 2020, Represented a large state-owned financial enterprise in China in handling a second-instance lawsuit case accepted by the Supreme People's Court due to a real estate mortgage agreement. Despite the party's comprehensive defeat in the first instance and the Supreme People's Court's judgment in another case that was extremely unfavorable to them, we achieved a victory with the Supreme People's Court's ruling to remand for retrial, with the disputed subject matter being approximately 700 million yuan.
• In 2021, Represented a local government in China in handling a retrial lawsuit case accepted by the Supreme People's Court due to a commissioned demolition and resettlement agreement. As the disputed facts of the case spanned more than 20 years and went through three levels of court trials and several hearings, to clarify the facts, the case team reviewed the case materials one by one, visited the site, and Presented the facts to the court in a concise, clear, and intuitive manner. Ultimately, we achieved a victory for the client by rejecting the other party's retrial application, with the disputed subject matter being 350 million yuan.
• In 2021, Represented an asset management company in China in handling a lawsuit case accepted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court due to an investment agreement. Before filing the lawsuit, we carefully designed the litigation strategy for the client and obtained evidence that was extremely favorable to the client and eliminated the litigation risks. We helped the client achieve a comprehensive victory in both the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court, with the disputed subject matter being approximately 500 million yuan.
• In 2021, Represented a supply chain company in China in handling a lawsuit case accepted by the Jiaxing Intermediate People's Court and the Zhejiang Provincial Higher People's Court due to a sales contract. In the face of false evidence submitted by the other party, which was extremely unfavorable to the client, we helped the client completely restore the essence of the transaction, which was actually an export agency relationship, and achieved a comprehensive victory in both the Jiaxing Intermediate People's Court and the Zhejiang Provincial Higher People's Court, rejecting all the other party's litigation requests, with the disputed subject matter being approximately 326 million yuan.
• In 2021, Represented a joint-stock bank in China in handling a lawsuit case accepted by the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court and the Shanxi Provincial Higher People's Court due to a financial loan agreement with a well-known real estate group. When accepting the case, the debtor's credit status was obviously poor. To seize the initiative, to realize the claim as soon as possible, the lawyer team fully demonstrated the necessity of filing a lawsuit as soon as possible and formulated a litigation strategy to increase the subject of the debt. By searching all the property information of the defendants and digging out the most valuable property clues, we successfully helped the client to complete the first seizure ahead of schedule and achieved a victory, with the disputed subject matter being 930 million yuan.
• Represented a state-owned investment company in China and the invested party in handling an arbitration case accepted by the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court due to an investment agreement. The main focus of the dispute in the case was whether the transfer of the partnership share agreed by both parties upon expiration belongs to the loan relationship or the partnership relationship. After several discussions, analyses, and comprehensive legal searches, the case team demonstrated from multiple angles such as the application of law and the logic of commercial transactions that the legal relationship involved in the case should be a partnership relationship. Ultimately, we achieved a comprehensive victory for the client and recovered a loss of more than 170 million yuan.